Do People at the Times Read History's End?

It sure seems like it to me. Here is an article discussing the possibility of war with Iran. While the whole article is worth reading, this part definitely caught my eye:

Iran, of course, secure now behind its nuclear wall, will surely step up its campaign of terror around the world. It will become even more of a magnet and haven for terrorists. The terror training grounds of Afghanistan were always vulnerable if the West had the resolve. Protected by a nuclear-missile-owning state, Iranian camps will become impregnable.

This phrase, nuclear wall, was one that I used over a year ago to describe why Iran was going nuclear. This author doesn't go as far as I do, however, in explaining why Iran wants that wall, namely to re-open the Sunni/Shi'ite Islamic civil war. The results of that war could be just as catastrophic as any nuclear war between Israel and Iran.