Assymetrical Civil War

The term, as far as I know, was coined by NeoConned over at LGF. I can think of no better description for the plan of action that the Democrats intend to carry out during and after the election. Lawsuits instead of Bullets. That emphasizes the Democrats strengths. They know they can't win a shooting war, so instead they opt to make the battlefield the courtrooms, where they hold the advantage. However, there is a problem with this approach. Last time, the Dems might have gotten away with it with Gore, because it was a single state, it was so close, and Gore won the popular vote. And there wasn't a war. Everthing is different know. Kerry is hated more than Gore, and is respected less. The stakes are far higher than they were in 2000. Many on the right were disgusted by the Democrats actions in 2000. They viewed such actions as an attempt to steal the election. If the Democrats try the same thing in 2004, to a larger scale, they will cause a firestorm that might not be able to be contained. When Americans think that their vote's don't matter, that in fact the election has been taken from them, they will be pissed. So the Democrats better be careful about "stealing the election" come November 2nd. It just might not be allowed to come to pass.